A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY? TO THEIR "DEMOCRACY"

Why do we find the Democrat party-oriented politicians, many in the media and a portion of their supporters in the public promoting that the more Conservative interpretation of the actual words contained in the Constitution is a threat to Democracy?

Because the more Conservative interpretation of what the Constitution actually Objectively says, intends and structures is a threat to their very Liberal and even absolutely Subjective interpretation of what the Constitution structures in THEIR opinion.

The MAGA movement is a threat to THEIR interpretation of "Democracy".

D. Caller: "California Rep. Dave Min has not deleted a social media post claiming Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin was part of the “MAGA” movement, even as reports indicate the suspect leaned left politically. (David Kunnghee Min (born March 5, 1976) is an American lawyer and politician who has served as the U.S. representative from California's 47th congressional district since 2025. A member of the Democratic Party)

Dave Min: “Now that the Charlie Kirk assassin has been identified as MAGA, I’m sure Donald Trump, Elon Musk and all the insane GOP politicians who called for retribution against the ‘RADICAL LEFT’ will now shift their focus to stopping the toxic violence of the RADICAL RIGHT,” Min wrote on X, Sept. 13."

I do not believe that for one second Charlie Kirks assassin was a MAGA follower.

Why was Charlie Kirk killed? Charlie Kirk was essentially killed because he, whether you agreed with him or not very effectively articulated and argued his point of view. Thats it.

Charlie Kirk was killed because he was articulate and had a clear understanding about what he believed, and he had a direction. Should anyone be killed because they can articulate what they believe and effectively argue their point of view?

Can YOU effectively articulate and communicate what you believe?

There is clearly now a younger component of the American culture white, black and brown who have been indoctrinated through their own narrowly informed conclusions or other individuals or organizations manipulations that they are victims. And their Subjective, "Righteous" and "Moralistic" perspective must prevail at all costs.

The evidence: A teacher or indoctrinator (?) in Canada: "The source added: “While playing this video repeatedly, he gave a speech to his students regarding anti-fascism, anti-trans, and how Charlie Kirk deserved for this to occur.” I am not making this stuff up.

Teacher allegedly showed Charlie Kirk assassination video to young students

And I think we now can clearly see that many of this segment of Americas younger people, certainly not all of them, are unable to clearly articulate what they believe and why and have a narrow perspective and some mental imbalance because of it. And they must strike out in violence when they feel they are impotent in the face of actual competence in arguing a point of view. And again, you did not have to agree with Charlie Kirk, believe whatever you choose to believe AS AN INDIVIDUAL.

Live and let live within reason, whether you are younger or an adult. But you must come to understand when you are being unreasonable. And if you are unable to accomplish that realization on your own then you may have a mental illness, and then it becomes the responsibility of others to assist you either through medical or legal intervention. Sometimes petulant children (and adults) need a time out.

There must be reasonable articulatable parameters that a society exists within and when those parameters are breached by some there must be consequences so as not to allow a minority of the misguided and possibly manipulated to destroy the system for all.

CONSEQUENCES: COMMENSURATE WITH CHOICES MADE

Are You Paying Attention Yet America? JGL 9/14/25