I DONT KNOW, YOU TELL ME
- jgl358
- Jun 26
- 2 min read
Updated: Jun 27
I will begin this with this statement being a man: I as a man, like most other men, have thought almost every stupid thing, I have said almost every stupid thing, and I have almost done every stupid thing. Still to this day, just a bit more self-aware and controlled. That being stated and admitted to by me I ask this question:
As the world of politics and political power in America and the Western world becomes more feminized what should we all expect?
Related to this question I have noticed something that goes on within female sports that seems to be a correlated indicator to me. And that something is currently ongoing within the WNBA and the clear bias, discrimination and allowed violence against one particular player, Caitlin Clark.
Caitlin Clark, who happens to be white and is IMO, and I am no expert, the best female player of basketball that I have ever seen. To me I compare her to Larry Bird as an amazing player in her skill, strategy and execution. She controls, puts the ball in the basket and throws up numbers like no other! People love watching her play. I will sit and watch Caitlyn Clark play, otherwise I really have no interest in watching any WNBA game, ever.
And because of this fact related to her skill and likeability she has been from what I understand a WNBA GOLDEN G00$E and rain maker for ALL the players and owners involved. And the fans by the actual numbers that attend and fill the seats when she is playing love to see her play.
So why do the other female players, apparently mostly the not white players who are directly benefitting in real material ways from her celebrity due to her skill, likability and ability to fill stadium seats with fans, why do they mean her physical harm? Actual physical harm.
This to me is a direct analogy to today's feminized Democrat / "progressive" / Democrat Socialist political party politics. In a desperate competition for political power and control what will those who seek more and more political power and control in a more feminized America do in order to dominate?
Men as a rule can when necessary be aggressive and brutal, and that is a known and accepted natural fact. And what is it that women can be when necessary? If the goings on in the WNBA are any indicator the female version of this drive for political power and control appears to be envy, hatred, violence and viciousness.
This snapshot looks like a desperate, vicious, violent organized shielded from the referee's eyes Mafia hit on the basketball court to me. And that seems to be what we are also seeing happening within the growing Liberal / Leftist / "progressive" Democrat feminized politics in America.
I don't know, you tell me.
Send to a friend, subscribe
Are You paying Attention Yet America? JGL all rights reserved 6/26/26
Only one way to deal with these animals...play their game!
It may be that because most women are smaller and weaker than most men, we recognize fewer rules of combat. For sure, no woman would ever come up with the Marquess of Queensbury rules.
Or it may be that because the female is responsible for the continuation of the species that we are closer to our basic animal nature. Everyone knows that the most dangerous place on earth is between a mother and her young.
But whether it's envy, hatred, fear, or whatever, IMOH it's a rare man that can match a woman for viciousness when she feels threatened. As Rudyard Kipling wrote, "For the female of the species is more deadly than the male."