JENNIFER: THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP TODAY
- jgl358
- 18 hours ago
- 4 min read
I was in a conversation with a good friend, and the name Jennefer Aniston came up, among men, and I commented: I never really got Jennefer Aniston. Her fame and adoration did not make sense to me. It did not make sense to me to the point that several years ago after every element of her life and personal relationship difficulties could not be any more featured in the media and pushed in my face I had to look into the why.
And as I suspected this was a contributing factor IMO:
"John Anthony Aniston (born Yannis Anastassakis, Greek: Γιάννης Αναστασάκης, July 24, 1933 – November 11, 2022) was a Greek-American actor who played Victor Kiriakis on the NBC daytime drama series Days of Our Lives, which he originated in July 1985 and played on and off for 37 years, until his death in 2022. His portrayal earned him a Daytime Emmy Award nomination for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series in 2017 and he received a Daytime Emmy Lifetime Achievement Award in 2022. He is the father of actress Jennifer Aniston.".
And then things made a bit more sense to me, perfect sense. Her daddy was a famous soap opera and Hollywood connected actor (Who I had never heard of). Her fathers fame and notoriety were leveraged in establishing her as a TV actress and the media did the rest. And she must have some core degree of natural talent, personal "cuteness" and appeal for sure.
It happens all the time, mothers and fathers naturally want to give their progeny every advantage, opportunity and point of career leverage that they can provide them. Open the door and walk through it if you can, if you dare and make the best of it. Makes perfect sense.
And then I asked myself a related question: How does this human condition in favoring your progeny express itself in the transfer of wealth and politics? How does it express itself both in the West and in the East?
To my point, and this is not any kind of indictment of young women or young men but just a recognition of the apparent facts about the flow of generational wealth and politics. It makes perfect sense.
Where do women and men billionaires primarily get their wealth from? And what are their politics? (There are 2640 billionaires in the world, a telling metric, do the math for yourself and draw your own conclusions)
"Of the world’s 431 female billionaires, three-quarters inherited at least part of their wealth, and 38% inherited all of it. This is far more common among women than men — only 5% of male billionaires inherit their fortunes. Many of the richest women are part of established family dynasties:"
Makes perfect sense, but then I ask: What do those women tend to do politically with that primarily inherited wealth?
"Male and female billionaires also give and spend differently. Women, for instance, put a greater focus on nonprofit and social organizations, according to the report."
Many nonprofits and NGOs (USAID) are at the core of massive fraud and corruption and the undermining of America and the West and are a prime funding source for the now radical anti-American Democrat party in my opinion.
"Recent years have seen high-profile cases where nonprofits misused donor funds, engaged in financial misconduct, or exploited charitable status for personal gain. These scandals highlight the importance of oversight, transparency, and accountability in the nonprofit sector."
I find these what appear to be facts about the creation of and the transfer of wealth, notoriety and politics very interesting and concerning in some regards. Concerning in a world that has a natural tendency for the disparate forces and belief systems of the West, and the disparate forces and belief systems of the East to collide ideologically, politically and potentially militarily.
As Western women who primarily tend to be more concerned with intellectualized emotional Liberal causes, which it can be argued is a more natural female tendency, become more influential. Does that natural tendency become an advantage for the forces of the East who are more practical and reality based in politics and seek their political and military goals in and against the West?
There is not much evidence that Eastern oriented women are becoming more and more wealthy or influential in politics, they are dominated by the Eastern male political animal spirit. So, is the West becoming politically weaker and more vulnerable as a result of the success of Capitalism and the creation of and the transfer of generational wealth as it passes to some of the now more influential females of the West?
I think that is an interesting and relevant question to be asking at this particular time in human and American history.
Jennefer Aniston, a beautiful young lady for sure, has been extremely successful, and I am sure is a fine person, I wish her only the best and I thank her in helping me making my point today :)
Are You Paying Attention Yet America? JGL all rights reserved 6/9/26




Comments