KING OR CONSTITUTION?

jgl358
Aug 8
2 min read

I saw this quick video from the Western Standard which I assume is a Canadian news organization and the commenter points out the difference between an Objectively structured Constitutional system. And a Subjectively structured "constitution".

On the Canadian truckers protesting. I assume during the Covid shut down: Justine Trudeau said: "This is starting to become illegal": Spoken like a true Monarch: https://youtu.be/u3rvmGpZSOE?si=nPor2uw640N4Ef3U 1 min.

Things you need to begin thinking about and understanding if you do not already: Who determines what "Reasonable Rights" are? A Subjective King or elite political group in power? Or an Objectively structured Constitution that prescribes a system and a process?

I thought it was instructive for those who may not fully appreciate the difference and the associated implications regarding process and what is legal and when it may become illegal depending on an individual or a political group in power Subjective opinion on the subject at hand. Political power in Canada is dominated by the Liberals and the Globalist Leftists who are Socialist and pretty much jr. communists. Everything they tend to do is not based in established Objectively structured law and justice, it is force. More and more.

All government is force, how much force do you want in your life?

"Is Canada a democracy or a kingdom? Or did the '82 Constitution give us a kingdom dressed up like a democracy?"

This is the authoritarian Lefts road map; U.N. Agenda 2030. This is what the Canadian, European and the American Democrat leadership and radical Leftists are attempting to fulfill. This is precisely where the D.E.I., "equity", trans men in women's sports and bathrooms, defund the police, eliminate the presidency and senate, disarm the population, reparations, white man bad comes from: Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Department of Economic and Social Affairs

And you can very clearly see this very same attitude and trend regarding the Rights of the people as structured by the American Constitution being proposed to be Subjectively adjusted to fit the likes and desires of the Democrat party and their new now very confident owners the radical DSA now openly admitting they are Communists.

I thought this was instructive, if you did not quite get what a true Objectively structured Constitution was before maybe this helps clarify things for you. You must understand these issues. TICK, TICK, TICK.

SHARE WITH A FRIEND AND SUBSCIBE

1 Comment

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.

No ratings yet

Guest

Aug 9

Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Our Constitution is really unique, as was our revolution. Canada is a Constitutional Monarchy. The people elect their representatives for the lower House, which is like England's House of Commons. The Governor General, who is appointed by the King of England, appoints the 105 members of the Senate, which is like England's House of Lords, only less free. They are all basically subservient to the King.

Thus, the Canadian Parliament is considered bicameral--the House of Representatives and the Crown, which is completely unlike our system where, even before Senators were elected by popular vote they were answerable to their respective state legislatures, which were answerable to the people. I don't know whether Canadians still consider themselves subjects rather than citizens…