THE "PROGRESSIVE" PARADOX
- jgl358
- 2 hours ago
- 3 min read
Remember to forward to a friend and add your name to the SIGMA3iOC email list
I think most Americans can agree that the "progressive" movement and agenda in America is in many ways an extreme expression of real and perceived biases against differently oriented and physically unique people who have felt disadvantaged in America by their orientation, association or difference.
We have seen the gay issue being hashed out, the trans issue being hashed out, the fat issue being hashed out, and the "progressives" very interesting and curious alignment with the more radical elements of Islam being revealed. And they are all gathered under the auspices, umbrella and organization of today's Democrat now Democrat Socialist party in America. Oy!
And these associated differently oriented and differently favored people all apparently hate Jews and Israel, hate Christians, hate white men, hate young white women, hate thin people, hate aesthetically attractive people, and most of all hate everything that the Constitution has given them by which they have the Right to do all of that hating.
And they favor Socialism, Communism and especially Islam.
And along that line I found this article about the so called "progressive" critics of recently deceased former sex symbol Bridgitt Bardot and her problem with Islam and how the weak Globalist government of France has facilitated and allowed its invasion into the country and the usurpation of the French culture and people.
Bardot was charged with “inciting racial hatred” that year for a letter she wrote to French officials in 2004. In it, she reportedly alludes to Muslims as “this population that leads us around by the nose, [and] which destroys our country.”
B. Bardot: "In 1996, she wrote in French newspaper Le Figaro, according to the NYT: “And so it is that my country, France, my homeland, has once again been invaded, with the blessings of successive governments, by an overpopulation of foreigners, especially Muslims, to whom we are supposed to swear allegiance. To this Islamic flood we are supposed to submit, against our will, all of our traditions.”
“We no longer have the right to be outraged when illegal immigrants or thugs profane and conquer our churches, in order to transform them into human pigsties, defecating behind the altar, pissing against the columns, spreading their nauseating smells beneath the sacred vaults of our choirs,” Bardot wrote in her 2003 book, according to The New York Times (NYT).
First let me say that I admire Ms. Bardot's ability to communicate in such a direct, patriotic and accurate manner. And second let me say that the faulty "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" assumption and association between the two life views where the "progressives" are aligned with a plainly stated anti-gay, trans and anti-American Constitution and everything that it structures is counter intuitive and over time deadly for one segment of the association.
Paradox: "A statement or sentiment that is seemingly contradictory or opposed to common sense and yet is perhaps true."
I personally do not want to live in a world where unattractive unfit hateful Socialists and Communists that promote the anti-Western anti Judeo / Christian world theory of freedom, individualism and prosperity dominates America and the world.
1/1/26: Newly minted New York City mayor, Zohran Mamdani (Democrat Socialist): "We will replace the frigid rigidity of rugged individualism with the warmth of collectivism."
I think that one sentence by a fully trained Marxist and quoter of the Communist Manifesto empowered by the "progressives" in America sums up my point here.
Are You Paying Attention Yet America? JGL 1/2/26
