top of page


Why are all of these legal prosecutions by unarguably and clearly extremely partisan and even collaborating and colluding with radical Democrat oriented district attorneys and prosecutors being streamlined and accelerated at this particular time in 2023?

The Fourteenth Amendment and this particular section, section 3:

"Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

The strategic political warfare theory IMO being that if the former president who at this moment in time is dominating most all political polls and could well be reinstalled in office in 2025 is convicted of some form of "insurrection" or "rebellion" that that will give some states the legal authority to reject his being on their presidential race ballots.

And there by precluding and short circuiting the former president winning. And secondarily possibly disgracing the former president in the eyes of the population. Choose one or both.

Period, pure political lawfare strategy in order to give legal justification to deny participation in an election.

* The Right to an accelerated or speedy trial is the Right of the accused and not the Right of the prosecutor or the government.

* The former president did not and has not participated in insurrection or rebellion.

* Any and all politically aspirational candidates and politically empowered politicians have the fiduciary responsibility to their supporters if they truly believe that an election is questionable or in fact fraudulent or corrupted to oppose the results and demand investigations wherever needed.

On insurrection and rebellion: "Although there are frequent concerns about statements made by media figures, on social media, or even by members of the government itself, there are two aspects of the crime of insurrection and rebellion that tend to limit its use.

The first is that, since insurrection and rebellion is a crime, private citizens do not have standing to file charges against someone. Only the government itself, acting through the Office of the Attorney General, can bring charges. The second reason that rebellion and insurrection are rarely charged is because of the strength of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment protection of free speech. A certain amount of hyperbole is tolerated, where there aren't accompanying overt acts. The general language of the crime also lends itself to interpretation, making prosecutions a chancier proposition.".

Love him or hate him, the former president did not participate in or incite either insurrection or rebellion. Political speech and fighting the results of a at the minimum very suspicious election is not about what you want to hear or like. Free speech, free political speech is generally defined as offensive speech to someone.

Why did the January 6th protest about the results of an election turn into a disgraceful riot? And who actually made it so and who strategically benefitted? Where are we today? Who is under indictment and who is doing the indicting? Convenient politically driven Strategy? You tell me. Looks like a duck to me.

Alan Dershowitz on the defendants Right to a speedy AND a fair trial. 14 million documents to review by next March? Doubtful, the judge and the prosecutor attempting to influence the presidential race: Always a master class in civil liberties, justice and the Constitution:

See: CHANGING MINDS: MAKE SURE YOU READ THIS ( You tell me how a political protest turned into a riot and who and what made it happen on January 6th, 2020.

How are such Political realm strategies justified? : MY POLITICAL LENS: STRATEGY OVER MORALITY (

Paying attention yet America? JGL 8/28/23

22 views2 comments


Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

This is chilling.

Replying to

Be chilled. They are fully indoctrinated radical political warfare soldiers, they are committed, and they are going for gold! Balls to the wall and damn the torpedoes! And this illustrates one of my fundamental points about the Constitution. The Constitution because of how it is structured forces the truth over time to be revealed to the people. And THAT is brilliant. And we can all see the proof of my point before us all.

bottom of page